Peyton 23-JT

From IFRR
Jump to: navigation, search

Have more information on Peyton 23-JT? This project depends on crowd-sourced information. Contact us: colorado-elections-wiki@googlegroups.com

Peyton 23-JT Demographics

Peyton 23-JT Superintendent

Peyton 23-JT School Board

2017 Election

On November 7th, 2017, 3 seats will be up for vote with only 3 candidates, including 2 incumbents.

There are two ballot measures specific to the district.

Sample Ballot here.

Candidates

(i) = incumbent
Ward Name Party Endorsements/Info Contact
At Large Julie Mannering Republican Email
At Large James Eckleberry (i) Republican Email
At Large Barton Hanks (i) Unaffiliated Email

Campaign Finance

Ballot Measures

3G - Mill Levy Override

Without increasing the current tax rate of 30.469 mills currently imposed for debt service on bonds, shall joint School District NO. 23JT taxes be increased $183,000 in 2018, and by whatever amounts are collected annually thereafter through December 31, 2023, by imposing a mill levy, which when combined with the mill levy for bonds, does not exceed 30.469 mills, to provide funding to:

  • Retain and recruit high quality teachers and support staff, and
  • Renovate and remodel existing educational facilities to extend its useful life;

But in no event shall the revenues from such tax increase be greater than the amount permitted by state law; and shall such tax increase constitute a voter approved revenue change to be collected and spent each year without regard to the limits of Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution or any other law?

  • Yes
  • No


Arguments For


Arguments Against


3H - Extend Term Limits to Three Consecutive Terms

Shall members of the Board of Directors of Joint School District No. 23JT, El Paso and Elbert Counties, Colorado, be authorized to serve three consecutive terms of office pursuant to the right granted to the voters of the district in Article XVIII, Section 11 of the Colorado Constitution to lengthen, shorten, or eliminate the limitations on the terms of office imposed by such section?

  • Yes
  • No


Arguments For


Arguments Against